Compare

The open-source, self-hosted Obsidian alternative built for teams

Last updated June 30, 2026

Obsidian is a beloved local-first markdown app — your notes are plain files you own, with an unrivaled plugin ecosystem and graph view. But it is built for one person: closed-source, no real-time multiplayer, no built-in AI or MCP, and Obsidian Publish is a hosted service you cannot self-host. tela keeps Obsidian's best idea — knowledge as portable markdown you own — and makes it a real team platform.

tela vs Obsidian, at a glance

A feature comparison of tela and Obsidian.
Feature tela Obsidian
License Open source (AGPL-3.0) Proprietary / closed-source
Self-hostable Yes — self-host free, plus a free cloud tier Local app; Publish is hosted, not self-hostable
Real-time collaboration Yes — multiplayer editing No — single-user; async vault sync
Team controls (SSO, roles) Yes No — single-user product
Ask your docs (AI) & MCP Built in — semantic + full-text, answers with citations None official (community plugins)
Generate docs from your code Yes — Atlas builds a cited, coverage-checked wiki from git + Jira No

Why teams switch to tela

When Obsidian is the better choice

For a single user's personal knowledge base, Obsidian is hard to beat: local-first and offline by default, an enormous plugin library, the graph view, and total control over a folder of files on your disk. For solo PKM or a personal digital garden, stay with Obsidian.

Try tela

tela is an open-source (AGPL), self-hostable team wiki. Self-host it, or start on the free cloud tier at telawiki.com. See the MCP server docs for connecting your agents, or compare tela with other tools.

obsidian.md — pricing + license (verified 2026). tela facts current as of June 2026.