Compare

tela vs Outline — the AI-native, fully open-source option

Last updated June 30, 2026

Outline is genuinely good and the closest comparison — a polished, self-hostable markdown wiki. The differences are three: license, pricing model, and the entire AI layer. Outline is BSL-1.1 (source-available, not OSI open source) with no free cloud and no first-class agent/auto-doc layer; tela is AGPL with a free cloud tier, a built-in MCP server, and Atlas.

tela vs Outline, at a glance

A feature comparison of tela and Outline.
Feature tela Outline
License Open source (AGPL-3.0) BSL 1.1 — source-available, not OSI open source
Self-hostable Yes — self-host free, plus a free cloud tier Yes (no free cloud)
Ask your docs (AI) Built in — semantic + full-text, answers with citations Self-host + your own OpenAI key
Agents read & write (MCP) Built in — agents read & write (39 scoped tools) No official server (third-party only)
Generate docs from your code Yes — Atlas builds a cited, coverage-checked wiki from git + Jira No

Why teams switch to tela

When Outline is the better choice

Outline is a mature, beautifully polished self-hosted wiki with a strong community. If you want a great self-hosted wiki today and do not need AI generation or agents, Outline is an excellent, stable choice.

Try tela

tela is an open-source (AGPL), self-hostable team wiki. Self-host it, or start on the free cloud tier at telawiki.com. See the MCP server docs for connecting your agents, or compare tela with other tools.

Outline pricing + BSL-1.1 repo license (verified 2026). tela facts current as of June 2026.